web stats
Home Authors Posts by Anamika Gairola

Anamika Gairola

Anamika Gairola
80 POSTS 0 COMMENTS
Anamika is a research-oriented writer with experience in writing blogs on home decor and real estate industry. Simply put, she knows the trend and expectations of today’s industry. She is an avid reader, wishes to travel the world, and loves to cook her favorite recipes when not writing.

10 Tallest Bollywood actress –  Know their real height

Bollywood has always been known for its glitz, glamour, and larger-than-life personas. Among the many stars who have graced the silver screen, there are some who stand out for their towering height and impressive presence. In this blog, we’ll take a closer look at the 10 tallest actresses in Bollywood and their remarkable debut films.

Yukta Mookhey – Height: 5’11”

Former Miss World Yukta Mookhey made her Bollywood debut with the film “Pyaar Koi Khel Nahin” opposite Sunny Deol. Although the film did not do well at the box office, Yukta’s tall frame and confident screen presence caught the audience’s attention.

Diana Penty – Height: 5’10”

Diana Penty made her debut with the film “Cocktail” alongside Saif Ali Khan and Deepika Padukone. Her girl-next-door charm and natural acting skills won her critical acclaim and a place in the hearts of audiences.

Kriti Sanon – Height: 5’10”

Kriti Sanon made her Bollywood debut with the film “Heropanti” opposite Tiger Shroff. Her tall frame and striking features helped her make a strong impact in her very first film.

Nargis Fakhri – Height: 5’9″

Nargis Fakhri made her debut with the film “Rockstar” alongside Ranbir Kapoor. Her tall and lean frame perfectly suited her character in the film, and she went on to become one of the most sought-after actresses in Bollywood.

Deepika Padukone – Height: 5’9″

Deepika Padukone made a stunning debut with the film “Om Shanti Om” opposite Shah Rukh Khan. Her tall and graceful presence on screen helped her make a mark in the industry, and she has since gone on to become one of the biggest stars in Bollywood.

Anushka Sharma – Height: 5’9″

Anushka Sharma made her debut with the film “Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi” opposite Shah Rukh Khan. Her tall frame and charming personality helped her become an instant favourite among audiences.

Sushmita Sen – Height: 5’9″

Former Miss Universe Sushmita Sen made her Bollywood debut with the film “Dastak” opposite Mukul Dev. Her tall and statuesque presence on screen helped her carve a niche for herself in the industry.

Katrina Kaif – Height: 5’8.5″

Katrina Kaif made her debut with the film “Boom” alongside Amitabh Bachchan and Jackie Shroff. Although the film did not do well at the box office, Katrina’s tall and stunning looks helped her become one of the most sought-after actresses in Bollywood.

Sonam Kapoor Ahuja – Height:  5’9″

Sonam Kapoor Ahuja is known for her elegant style and fashion sense. Born on June 9, 1985, in Mumbai. She made her acting debut in the 2007 film “Saawariya” and has since acted in numerous successful films like “Raanjhanaa,” “Neerja,” “Pad Man,” and “Veere Di Wedding.” 

Lisa Haydon – Height: 5’10”

Born on June 17, 1986, in Chennai, Lisa is of Indian and Australian descent. She started her career as a model and gained popularity after featuring in the Kingfisher Calendar in 2010. She made her Bollywood debut in the 2010 film “Aisha” and has since appeared in movies like “Queen,” “Housefull 3,” and “Ae Dil Hai Mushkil.”

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

WBRERA implementation committee structure raises concerns among homebuyers’ group

The Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE), a nationwide homebuyers’ organization, has expressed concerns over the composition and structure of the committee formed by the West Bengal housing department for the implementation of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, and the West Bengal Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Rules, 2021.

The committee comprises two members from the state government’s housing department, three from the West Bengal real estate regulatory authority, and four real estate developers operating in the state, including Debasis Ghosh, joint secretary of the state’s housing department and president of real estate developers’ body CREDAI-Bengal, as joint convenors.

FPCE has raised concerns over the absence of representation for homebuyers in the committee and the over-representation of real estate developers, despite the committee’s mandate of ensuring a smooth implementation of the Act and rules. The organization believes that RERA was created to protect the interests of homebuyers and that malpractices in the sector persist.

Abhay Upadhyay, president of FPCE, emphasized that consumers should have been empowered and part of the committee to ensure effective implementation of RERA. He also pointed out that FPCE had previously written to the state’s chief minister to intervene and issue necessary directions to ensure the full operation of RERA and the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.

In December, WBRERA was established, nearly 18 months after the Supreme Court declared the state’s own legislation, West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (WBHIRA), unconstitutional and paved the way for RERA implementation in the state. However, FPCE has raised concerns over issues such as the launch and sale of unregistered projects, malpractices, and the diversion of funds from projects.

FPCE has been advocating for the implementation of the central Act in the state and has been in constant dialogue with the ministry of housing and urban affairs. The organization had also previously approached the Supreme Court against WBHIRA.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

68 out of 115 Group Housing Projects in Noida are Defaulters, Still Awaiting Occupancy Certificates

According to recent reports, 68 out of 115 group housing projects in Noida, India are still awaiting occupancy certificates, highlighting the challenges faced by the real estate sector in the region. The delay in obtaining occupancy certificates has led to significant financial losses for developers and affected homebuyers’ ability to move into their new homes.

The reasons for the delay in obtaining occupancy certificates are varied, with factors such as non-compliance with building codes and regulations, legal disputes, and financial issues contributing to the problem. The lack of occupancy certificates has also affected the ability of developers to sell their properties, further exacerbating their financial difficulties.

The situation has caused frustration among homebuyers, who have invested their hard-earned money in these properties and are still waiting to move into their homes. The delay has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and regulation in the real estate sector, with stakeholders calling for stronger measures to protect homebuyers’ interests.

The real estate sector in Noida has been facing challenges in recent years, with several developers facing financial difficulties and a slowdown in demand for properties. The delay in obtaining occupancy certificates has added to the sector’s challenges, highlighting the need for a more efficient and transparent regulatory framework.

In conclusion, the delay in obtaining occupancy certificates for group housing projects in Noida is a significant challenge for the real estate sector in the region. The situation has affected developers’ financial stability, homebuyers’ ability to move into their new homes, and the sector’s overall reputation. The situation highlights the need for greater transparency and regulation in the sector, and stakeholders are calling for stronger measures to protect homebuyers’ interests.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

The government’s emphasis on constructing homes on land under PMAY-U

New Delhi: A parliamentary standing committee in India has raised concerns over the government’s over-emphasis on one vertical of the PM Awas Yojna (Urban) scheme, which provides financial assistance to people for constructing pucca houses on their land, over two other verticals of In-Situ Slum Redevelopment (ISSR) and Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP).

The committee, headed by JD(U) MP Rajiv Ranjan Singh, observed that the majority of urban homeless are also landless, and purchasing a piece of land in an urban area is more challenging than constructing a house on it.

According to details provided by the housing and urban affairs ministry to the panel, nearly 60% of the houses sanctioned under the PMAY (Urban) are under the BLC vertical, followed by Construction Linked Subsidy Scheme (20%), and the share of the ISSR is barely 3%. The report mentioned that the ministry had informed the panel that there was no particular emphasis on any vertical and that all four verticals of the scheme were open to the states, UTs, and beneficiaries to choose from based on their suitability.

However, during an evidence session, the ministry representatives said that “the states also find it more convenient to give houses in smaller cities and to people who have their own land. This is why we have seen BLC vertical growing up.”

Taking note of the ministry’s statement that it had not conducted any independent urban housing need assessment study for the flagship scheme, the panel said that this being a demand-driven scheme, there are chances that some homeless people who did not fulfill the eligibility conditions for the scheme or due to other impediments like a maximum contribution from individuals, a requirement of land could not avail of the benefit.

The committee has recommended that the ministry conduct an impact assessment study of the scheme to find out the ground realities, its benefits, gaps, and shortcomings. The ministry may thereafter explore the feasibility of either extending the existing scheme with modifications based on an impact assessment study or formulating another such scheme to benefit the urban poor at large so as to achieve the Government of India’s objective of Housing for All. The committee believes that conducting such an assessment is crucial in ensuring that the scheme achieves its objectives of providing affordable housing to all urban homeless, reducing the number of urban homeless, and alleviating the housing crisis in urban areas.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

DLF Reports Record Pre-Launch Sales of INR 8,000 Crores for Luxury Residences in Gurugram

DLF Limited, one of India’s largest real estate developers, has announced that it has achieved a record pre-launch sales figure of INR 8,000 Crores for its luxury residences located in Gurugram. The development, known as ‘The Camellias’, is situated in the prime location of Golf Course Road and offers luxury apartments and penthouses with modern amenities and world-class facilities.

The company’s Managing Director, Mr. Aakash Ohri, stated that the response to the project had been overwhelming, and the sales figures are a testament to the trust and confidence that buyers have placed in DLF. The project has garnered interest from both domestic and international buyers, indicating the growing demand for luxury homes in the country.

DLF has a proven track record of delivering high-quality projects, and ‘The Camellias’ is no exception. The development boasts luxurious living spaces, breathtaking views, and state-of-the-art facilities such as a spa, gym, and swimming pool. The project is also in close proximity to premium retail and dining destinations, making it an ideal location for those seeking a luxurious and convenient lifestyle.

The real estate market in India has seen a surge in demand for luxury homes, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, as people seek more spacious and comfortable living spaces. DLF’s success in achieving such a significant sales figure is a testament to its commitment to delivering top-quality projects that cater to the evolving needs and preferences of its buyers.

In conclusion, DLF’s record pre-launch sales figures for ‘The Camellias’ are a reflection of the growing demand for luxury homes in India and the trust and confidence that buyers have in the company’s ability to deliver exceptional living spaces.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

DTCP formed teams to check occupation certificates

GURUGRAM: The Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) has organized three teams to inspect the buildings for which Gurgaon’s self-certification policy resulted in occupation certificates being issued by architects.

According to announcements made on Thursday. Within three days, they must check the validity of at least 10% of all granted OCs and submit a report.

Under the state’s self-certification program, DTCP had given architects the authority to grant OCs to specific residential houses in licensed colonies in November last year. Since the program’s implementation, 170 OCs have been granted by architects in Gurgaon.

According to a Thursday order from district town planner Rajesh Kaushik, “three ATPs and JEs have been directed to check the sites in licensed colonies across the city where OCs have been issued from February 15 till date.” This was done in accordance with the standard procedure regarding the issuance of occupation certificates under the self-certification scheme.

The DLF-1 and DLF-2, South City-1 and -2, Sushant Lok-1, Malibu Towne, and Rosewood locations will be checked by the first team, led by ATP Jogender Singh, along with two JEs. The second team, led by ATP Kuldeep Singh, will examine the occupation certificates in Sushant Lok-2 and -3, DLF-3, Greenwood City, Palam Vihar, Sun City, and Mayfield Garden. The third team, led by ATP Hitesh Hooda, will examine OCs for properties in DLF-4 and -5, Vipul World, Uppal Southend, Vatika India Next, sectors 106 to 109, Farrukhnagar, and Sohna.

A property’s occupation certificate can be issued under the program by any architect who is registered with the Council of Architecture (CoA) after reviewing the necessary paperwork. A physical copy of the application and supporting documents must be delivered to DTCP for record within three days of the OC being issued.

The district town planners must inspect at least 10% of the OCs issued in the region to ensure that they are not issued fraudulently. The DTP has the authority to issue a show-cause notice, blacklist the architect, and/or revoke the certificate in the event that any violations are discovered or construction on the building granted an OC is discovered to be incomplete. Additionally, the department may advise the registration authority to not register any floors or buildings connected to the offending architect.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

Kiara Advani Ranks Third in Popularity, Surpassing Katrina Kaif and Shraddha Kapoor, but Alia Bhatt Remains on Top

According to the latest Ormax list, Kiara Advani has made impressive strides in her career and is now ranked third in terms of popularity among Bollywood actresses.

She has surpassed big names like Katrina Kaif and Shraddha Kapoor, and her success is well-deserved. However, Alia Bhatt still holds the number one spot as the most beloved actress on the list.

Deepika Padukone comes in at second place, but even she has been surpassed by the popularity of Alia Bhatt. Deepika is currently in the United States to attend the 2023 Oscars as one of the presenters.

Shraddha Kapoor, who has made a comeback after the super success of Tu Jhoothi Main Makkar, ranks sixth on the list.

Kriti Sanon has also made a mark by surpassing Shraddha Kapoor and gaining the fifth rank. Being an outsider in the industry, Kriti has done exceptionally well.

 

Katrina Kaif is in the fourth position, surpassing big names like Kareena Kapoor Khan and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan.

Kareena Kapoor Khan is in the seventh position on the list, but she remains a perfect example of how to balance personal and professional lives gracefully.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

Jaypee liquidation — Suraksha Group’s resolution plan to acquire Jaypee Infratech

NEW DELHI: According to the NCLT’s order, a five-member monitoring committee has been established to oversee the execution of Suraksha Group’s resolution plan to purchase indebted Jaypee Infratech. More than 20,000 stranded homebuyers were relieved on March 7 when the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved Suraksha group’s bid to acquire Jaypee Infratech Ltd.

Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL) stated in a regulatory filing that “an ‘Implementation and Monitoring Committee’ has been formed in accordance with the approved resolution plan” in compliance with the NCLT’s order.

Anuj Jain, a Jaypee Infratech Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), is one of the IMC’s (Implementation and Monitoring Committee) members.

Aalok Dave, managing director and chief executive officer of Suraksha ARC, is a member of the IMC. Additionally, Suresh Kumar Bansal has been included in the panel by Suraksha Realty.

In addition to being a member of the IMC, Kuldeep Kumar represents homebuyers in the Committee of Creditors (CoC).

Sanjay Kumar Sipani has been appointed to the IMC on behalf of assenting lenders.

Last week, the NCLT directed that an interim resolution professional (IRP) form a monitoring committee within seven days and take all necessary steps to expedite the resolution plan’s implementation.

“On a daily basis, the monitoring committee would supervise and monitor the progress of unit construction and related infrastructure development, and file a monthly report before this Adjudicating Authority (NCLT),” the NCLT bench stated.

JIL’s corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) was launched in August 2017 following an application by an IDBI Bank-led consortium. 

The Suraksha group received 98.66 percent of the votes cast in the fourth round of the bidding process to find a buyer for JIL in 2021.

According to the resolution plan, Suraksha Group will invest Rs 250 crore in Jaypee Infratech and also set up a Rs 3,000 crore loan for the completion of roughly 20,000 apartments in a number of stalled projects over the following four years.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

MahaRERA issues notices to 1,781 projects linking their bank accounts to multiple projects

According to a Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) investigation, 1,781 projects broke the law by connecting their bank accounts to multiple projects.

It is required by the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act of 2016 that the project have a single bank account with a single registration number. This aims to complete registered housing projects correctly and without diverting any money.

The regulator has already sent show-cause notices to 45 of these projects in response to these irregularities, and it is currently sending notices to the remaining projects.

The regulator has made modifications to its systems in order to prevent the occurrence of such irregularities in the future. Any attempt to link a project’s designated account with its bank account will be rejected by the updated system.

In addition, the developer will not be able to modify the mutual account under the new system. In accordance with a recent MahaRERA order, prior approvals are now required for this change.

MahaRERA, the real estate industry’s regulatory body, has started taking these steps to increase financial discipline and transparency in the industry, protect homebuyers’ investments and interests, and boost the sector’s credibility.

The developer is required by the Real Estate Act to keep just one bank account with just one RERA registration number. The money received for the specific project must be kept in this account and used solely for its tasks. It is not permitted to be used for any other project or purpose because doing so could harm the project.

Additionally, the developer is required to keep 70% of the funds received from the project’s registration in this account. The developer is not permitted to make arbitrary withdrawals from this account.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

Prefabricated buildings – Know its Advantage and Disadvantage

Prefabricated buildings, which are frequently constructed off-site, have become extremely popular in recent years. There are some drawbacks to prefabricated building formats, despite the advancement of technology, decreased pollution, and lower cost of construction. 

Prefabricated construction, which began in Europe after World War II, has recently become a common trend in many parts of the world and is rapidly catching up in India. The construction of a prefabricated or prefab building involves assembling of various components produced in a factory at the development site. For example, steel frames for buildings, panels made of wood, cement, gypsum, and other materials for walls and floors, ceilings, as well as manufactured doors, windows, and ventilators, are some of the raw materials used most frequently in prefabricated buildings.

Modular homes come in segmented parts and save time, money, and energy compared to traditional homes, where a team of workers must spend months building the structure. But before making a choice, experts advise weighing the advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages of prefabricated buildings

Saves construction time

The ability to build a project more quickly than with traditional methods is one of prefab’s biggest advantages. Assembling and connecting the parts are the only tasks left to be completed on the construction site because all the parts have already been partially built.

“The entire process takes 6-8 weeks based on the internal and external specifications,” says Sumit Agrawal, Architect and Interior Designer. For example, if your home plans are straightforward without any intricate engineering or custom details, it might take 4-6 weeks, whereas the assembling process only takes 2-3 weeks.

Cost-effective

Prefab homes are comparatively more affordable as traditional construction costs rise. It uses inexpensive building supplies like plasterboard, floor tiles, and terrace block. Many developers have begun using prefab materials in their buildings because of the low cost. The outer structure is constructed using traditional methods. But internal division and expansion are accomplished with prefab.

Minimizes ecological pressure

The largest contributor to environmental pollution worldwide is the construction industry. The high rate of construction activity, combined with a poor choice of raw materials, significantly contributes to the environmental threat. The primary building material, burnt brick, is the primary source of air pollution and greenhouse gas  (GHG) emissions. 

The production of 170 billion bricks annually uses about 24 million tonnes of coal and emits 61.3 million tonnes of CO2, according to the TERI Report, Green Growth and Building Sector in India, 2015. Cement and steel are also two important materials that increase GHG emissions.

In contrast, modular homes made without cement and bricks are more environmentally friendly. Aside from that, there is noise pollution because the building components are created off-site.

Disadvantages of prefabricated buildings

Lengthier planning process

The planning process is typically lengthy, even though the construction and assembling of the prefab property may not take much time. It takes a lot of time and effort to find the land, choose the contractor, and prepare the site.

Quality problems

Prefab structures are infamous for not offering the same level of quality as traditional structures. These methods only offer a small number of customization and service options. According to Shivakshi Gogia, CEO of Ascent Group, “Building designs have restrictions on dramatic aesthetic changes, and costs increase greatly when building sites are located more than 500 miles from the factory. 

Threat of damage

Prefab structures are transported from the factory site to the construction site, and there is always a risk of damage during transit, according to architect and interior designer Sumit Agrawal. In addition, the cost may increase depending on how far the modules must travel.

Inefficient assembling

When installing the modules, pay attention to detail. Any assembling error may result in leaks, void spaces, or joint problems. Therefore, precise assembly is essential.  To prevent issues in the future, proper consideration should be given to the measurements and placing of large prefabricated buildings.

For purchasers with a clear plan of what they want within a confined timeline and a specific price range, prefab homes are ideal. Anyone considering a self-build should be sure they are fully aware of all their options and when each option is best. Prefab homes are not right for everyone or every site.

Although offering various advantages over traditional residences, you are still responsible for the construction of such homes. Conduct thorough research and consult with the manufacturer to make sure that quality requirements are being met and there are no inconsistencies.

Follow and Connect with us: TwitterFacebookLinkedinInstagram

Latest News